On Monday Sydney Pollack died. He was, as I am sure you know, an amazing director and not a bad actor either! There will be thousands of web-tributes to him, so, I will just add my voice to the crowd in that respect.
But, I am writing this because it was just Sunday night that I saw Pollack on a TVE (TV España) programme about the treatment of film by television networks. Pollack was there because of the lawsuit that the Danish Directors Guild brought against DR (Demark's nationalized TV station) with regards to the showing of a Pan and Scan version of Pollack's 3 Days of the Condor. The Director's Guild argued that it was a violation of a piece of art. it was shown in Danish court with the original cinemascope version, but a hilighted area indicating the pan and scan. It was, at times, laughable. There were fights where you couldn't see the other person being fought!
The documentary was an interesting piece, especially when it came to the area of sound. It argued against the dubbing of movies, saying that an integral part of the movie is the voice of the actors. An actor is hired not just to stand there and move his mouth, but to give life to a character in all ways, including speech. The irony is, of course, that Spain and Italy are 2 of the few countries that continue to dub - and TVE is the biggest violator, all but refusing to show subtitled films.
One interest piece of trivia was the handling in Spain of 'Fort Apache', the seminal John Wayne movie.
There is a scene in the movie where Wayne speaks to an Indian (or Native American, if you prefer) through an interpreter. In Spain Wayne speaks to the interpreter and the indian speaks in this very odd 'ooga-booga' type language. Ironically, in the 'real' version of the film the Indian is speaking Spanish! This ridiculous act of dubbing is still available in Spain today.
Anyway, hopefully Spain (and Italy, and all the other dubbing countries) will come to their senses and see films for the art that they are and leave them unadulterated.
Yeah, right.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Google
Bookmark me
FilmAmora
phil's shared news
Weather
Learn Japanese
Gearing up for the inevitable move, I am learning Japanese. here is the greatest site I have ever found for learning a language.
Sites
Dog Walking Music
The future of intenet media
3 comments:
Dubbing & Subtitling help content to cross language barrier & get appreciation of "local" audience.
Adulteration can happen in either of localization method.The onus is on the audience (customer) to choose.The choice is entirely on consumer.
Terming dubbing as less creative,educative or communicative method would be not correct.As different perception of service & communication differs for each.
Media Movers, Inc.
Dubbing of creative works is adulteration. A significant portion of the actor's portrayal of a role comes through voice. To presume that someone can dub with the same effectiveness is, in my experience of running a distribution company, laughable.
Dubbing of non-fiction works like educational programs and the like of course is entirely different and I would agree with you.
It is our responsibility as filmmakers and distributors to give the audience the best possible experience... not the easiest.
I don't expect the process to stop, and of course there ARE situations (like programs aimed a children) where it is acceptable.
Completely agree on actor's portrayal of a role coming through voice.
"same-effectiveness" is an open-ended concept...in many cases even the original actors arent able to dub with effectiveness as a director envisioned & often they re-dub with proffesional dubber/or other actor(s)
It is the attachment with the original content/language which finds flaws in the localization.
Similar to the feeling of a creative person whos feature or book is being re-made into a new film.
Audience carves for best experience & this experience can be either of localization.
Post a Comment